Culture affect behavior for the obvious reason that one’s lifestyle is a collection of behaviors and habits a person has. Culture is the setting in which one enacts those behaviors and habits that make up one’s lifestyle. Due to the nature of our cultural setting, culture will, effect one’s lifestyle and, by connection, behavior
Behavior at times is an individual’s choice, cultural conditioning does not force someone to become what they are today but they chose to be what they are. For example someone raised in an extremely abusive family may chose not to continue with the cycle of violence, although it may seem like a natural choice due to its conditioning and negative influences. Failure to make such choices an individual carries over their abusive behaviors and as they grow up the abusive behaviors takes over and the cycle is repeated. On a general perspective it may appear as part of family’s culture but it is only a matter of choice. For this reason, cultural conditioning and norms do not force us to become who we are, but its our personal choice that determines what we become but under the influence of cultural norms within us.
Individualism social pattern places the highest value on the interests of the individual, as independent and with less connect to the groups of which they are a part. The individuals are self-reliant and competitive. Collectivism places the highest value on the interests of the group and individuals are interdependent and closely linked to one or more groups. The common collectivist traits are respect and cooperation.
Career development is mainly money driven in a free market and every individual would be vying for the highest paying job without considering the means of getting to the job, some individuals may develop strategies to eliminate others who may seem to block their success path. But individuals should be willing to make less money than they would prefer and do jobs that they do not like.
These two cultural perspectives Individualists and collectivists help individuals views themselves to have proper relationships to others, their approaches to conflict resolution tend to diverge in dramatic ways.
Miles, D. R., ; Carey, G. (1997). Genetic and environmental architecture of human aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 207-217.